![](https://www.soonerpolitics.org/uploads/1/6/2/2/16224166/229007913.jpg)
September 14, 2020 at 08:19AM - StevenCrowder
The Left Doubles Down on ‘Cuties’ Pedo Agenda! | Good Morning #MugClub
Click the headline to read the full report at StevenCrowder
![]() September 14, 2020 at 08:19AM - StevenCrowder The Left Doubles Down on ‘Cuties’ Pedo Agenda! | Good Morning #MugClub Click the headline to read the full report at StevenCrowder ![]() Unbelievably, two police officers getting ambushed is almost the least offensive part of this story. The incident happened in Los Angeles, where two sheriff's deputies were shot while sitting in their car. The deputies, a 24-year-old man and a 31-year-old woman, were both in critical condition and "fighting for their lives" as they underwent surgery following the attack, which occurred around 7 p.m. local time outside a Metro rail station in Compton, according to the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department. As of this writing, the manhunt is still underway for the suspect. Most people would assume political motive, since one ideology — the Joe Biden supporting one — has made it clear how they feel about the police (see RIOTERS BURNED DOWN A MINNEAPOLIS POLICE STATION, POLICE FLEE and PORTLAND PROTESTERS DECLARE: "BURN EVERY PRECINCT TO THE GROUND!"). We will see what the shooter's motives were when he is captured. As for the shooter's supporters, their motives are more clear. To the protesters blocking the entrance & exit of the HOSPITAL EMERGENCY ROOM yelling "We hope they die" referring to 2 LA Sheriff's ambushed today in #Compton: DO NOT BLOCK EMERGENCY ENTRIES & EXITS TO THE HOSPITAL. People's lives are at stake when ambulances can't get through. Confirmed via witness who talked to ABC7: Says protesters made derogatory comments towards deputies and tried to get inside the emergency room. https://t.co/qxeR54Rywt NOW: Black Lives Matter protesters yell “I hope they die" outside the hospital where 2 Los Angeles Sheriff Deputies were shot. #BLM pic.twitter.com/c9b3b3pFyz Again, this is still a breaking news story. As of this writing, the two deputies are still fighting for their lives and the suspect is still on the loose. Please keep the deputies, their families, and their brother officers in your prayers. Also, when people boo at NFL games today during the social justice virtue signalling before kickoff and the media attacks the audience for it, people aren't booing because they "hate unity." They booing because of stories like this that both the media and the entertainment industry actively ignore because it's politically inconvienent for them.
Joe Rogan and Tim Kennedy DISMANTLE Protesters: "Do You Have Any Idea How Gddmn Crazy This is?"9/12/2020 ![]() Count me among the people who aren't fans of Rogan's new set. Courtney said the name of the paint color is "Gingivitis" and I can't think of a better way to describe anything ever. But we're here now for this great clip between Joe and Tim Kennedy (see TEACHER CALLS JOE ROGAN THE 'BIGGEST THREAT' IN THE 'LAST DECADE' and TIM KENNEDY: WATERBOARDING WORKS BECAUSE WE WATERBOARD P***IES) on just how dangerous the "protesting" has gotten. Not in a "violent riot" way, but in a fear over what comes next way. Starting with Tim Kennedy — who is an Army Ranger and Special Forces — drawing an alarming comparison between the leftists in Portland and the foreign insurgents that Kennedy gets sent to put down.
![]() Most protesting is dumb and the way this country has normalized protesting outside of people's homes is frightening. But if you're going to do it, don't do it outside of Cocaine Mitch's house. My dude is the patron saint of not givingAF and being savage while not giving that F (see COCAINE MITCH DEFECATING ON THE NEW YORK TIMES IS THE CONTENT WE NEED and WATCH: COCAINE MITCH SAVAGES DEMOCRATS OVER GREEN NEW DEAL VOTE). However if you are super bored and feel like protesting outside of his home anyway, have a more compelling reason than he owes you a $600 stimulus check. Protesters outside of Mitch McConnell's house demanding their $600.00 pic.twitter.com/CTJD1cwnBr This is essentially the 2020 equivalent of the paperboy harassing John Cusack in Better Off Dead. To you youngbloods, that's an 80s reference. Google it. Look, I thought keeping stimulus checks outside of the 'rona aid bill was stupid. I fully agree with all the economic reasons why it's a horrible idea. But the GOP hasn't given a wet fart about fiscal responsibility for the last four years. To pretend they care about it now, less than two months before a presidential election AND during a pandemic, it's like they want to be voted out of power. Just so they can go back to pretending to care about fiscal responsibility. Though let's be honest. The GOP could have included an eleventy thousand dollar check for every American citizen AND illegal immigrant, and the Democrats would have still blocked it. Every Senate Democrat just voted against hundreds of billions of dollars of COVID-19 relief. They blocked money for schools, testing, vaccines, unemployment insurance, and the Paycheck Protection Program. But protesting because you're not getting an arbitrarily decided amount of money from the government? Outside of the liberal idiots there, no one watching is going to have any sympathy. It would also make more sense to move the protest outside of Chuck Schumer's house since he's the one who blocked the aid from even being debated. Where if Democrats cared, they could have forced a debate on the matter. If you want to know where your $600 is, ask Chuck.
Woman Makes Serious Money Acting Like a 'Kinky' Dog Because Our Culture is in Serious Decline9/11/2020 ![]() Two things about this story are equally terrible. One, a young woman is making a lucrative career by acting like a dog on camera, and two, all the perverts making it possible. Meet Jenna Phillips. She gave up what was likely a decent job as an optician to pretend to be a dog. Including a dog that pees inside, eats dog food, and plays fetch. I would be sorry to bring this story to your attention, but I have points to make about how far we've strayed from the light. From The Mirror: She used to pretend to be a puppy, rolling around, fetching balls and loved getting praise like 'good girl.' That's when she decided to kink it up for cash. Don't judge, it happens to everyone. There you are taking selfies and you think to yourself, "Self, what if I put on a dog collar, some short shorts or nothing at all, and crawl around on the floor barking for cash?" A lot of people try to claim that a criticism of something is condemning the right to do it. No, dummies. I'm not criticizing Jenna and her freaky fans' right to be weird. I'm criticizing the weird itself. Same right that says Jenna can be a Labradoodle-do-me grants me the right to pen terrible dog puns. "The majority of the puppy community is for gay men. Whenever I went shopping for the gear, it was only really for men. Ah, the free market at work. Good Girl here saw an opportunity to own her piece of the market, and raised a leg to it. Now she's dominating it and probably making more money than the most of us. Which should help console her as I tell her what a bad girl she's being and she should rub her nose in it. She probably has a video of just that and used the revenue from it to buy a car I couldn't afford. All this to say our culture could probably use a little more respect, as well as some willingness to reach out to someone so clearly in need of help. Jenna has admitted she likes being praised, and that's one reason she acts like a dog. She's looking for validation and is finding it in a terrible place. So sure, this post is mocking in nature. But we should probably be sad for this poor woman. Are there people in her life who're watching this happen without offering help? I ask because of this quotation:
I'm not suggesting we point fingers or smack her bottom with a rolled up newspaper. But has anyone tried offering her some help? Anyone? Or are the possible do-gooders in her life terrified of being canceled and banished from society for questioning Jenna's identity?
![]() Some people really are beyond parody. Candace Bure, who's been married to her husband Val Bure for 24 years, posted a photo to her Instagram Stories wherein her husband had his arm around her shoulders with a hand placed atop her bewb. If you're staring at the screen in a look of consternation, wondering why we're even here talking about this, congratulations, you're not a freak. Based on what Candace has said about the "incident" it would seem some people online don't know where babies come from. Do not tell them, it might shatter their illusions of love. According to Page Six, Bure initially deleted the photo after getting trolled by a bunch of... well, not even prudes. I'm not sure what to call these joyless tw*ts who can't even over a husband holding his wife's breast. But then she realized she wasn't the one who was wrong, and re-uploaded what I'd categorize as "marriage goals." She added: "For all of the Christians that are questioning my post with my husband's hand on my boob — my husband of 24 years — thinking it was inappropriate, it makes me laugh because it's my husband. We have so much fun together," she responded in a series of since-deleted videos, the Daily Mail reports. I have to assume the trolls shaming Candace for a little boob grabbage also have two adjoining twin beds with at least 2 feet separation. They probably sleep in full length silk pajamas, buttoned all the way to the neck. They only hold hands during scary movies, offer but one peck on the cheek in greetings and goodbyes, and say things like "gee golly" without irony. They're the types of people I mentioned casually in this post about forbidding their precious offspring, obviously delivered via a pure white stork on a Sunday after church, to watch Star Wars for fear it might taint their view of The Lord Jesus. "I'm sorry if it offended you — I'm actually not sorry," she said with a laugh. "I'm glad we have fun together after so many years. He can touch me all day long." See, when I first saw this story, after having a chuckle at the kinds of squares who'd be upset by it, I thought what we should really be celebrating is that a couple married for 24 years was still hot for each other. Val can't help his lady is still looking smoking all these years later and, if I may say, has a nice pair of bodacious ta-tas. So I don't know who needs to hear this, but obviously quite a few: married couples touch each other in places. They do more than write lengthy love letters using nothing but chaste language. They also, sometimes, have sex. Sometimes not even to create babies. Sometimes, and brace yourselves for this, couples have sex for the fun of it. Real mystery why some people on the Christian right get mocked for being puritans. I'll have to research this phenomenon further. But here's something which should get you riled up:
![]() The movie Taken is a story of a father fighting to save his daughter from sex trafficking. At no point in the film were the sex traffickers portrayed glamorously. The movie Cuties is a story of eleven-year-old girls enticed by the glamorization of sex exploitation who then freely exploit themselves sexually in front of adult actors, adult film crews, adult audiences, set to modern pop music which all but encourages the behavior with its upbeat tone. Only a complete moron would think the film was somehow condemning child exploitation. Yet after Thursday's justified internet backlash against the pedophile's new favorite go-to, Netflix insists their film is a work of art: "Cuties is a social commentary against the sexualization of young children," a Netflix spokeswoman told the DCNF late Thursday. "It's an award winning film and a powerful story about the pressure young girls face on social media and from society more generally growing up – and we'd encourage anyone who cares about these important issues to watch the movie." I'll bite. Cuties is as much a social commentary against the sexualization of young children as Batman is a social commentary against vigilante justice. Cuties is as much a social commentary against the sexualization of young children as The Fast and The Furious is a social commentary against aggressive driving. Cuties is as much a social commentary against the sexualization of young children as Ocean's Eleven is a social commentary against conning a casino. Which is to say, are you effing kidding me? Also check out: 'Cuties' is a Clear Case of Sexualizing Children and the Filmmakers Should be Ashamed. Conversely, "Breaking Bad" is a social commentary against the drug trade and how power and evil corrupt. And what can happen if you're a wife who emasculates her husband who's already feeling bad about himself. Audiences can generally spot the difference. Sure, sure, I'll grant that the same people who won't let their children watch Star Wars because it is somehow against their religion often believe a subject covered in fiction is a straight endorsement of it. But I'm going to say that faction is small, and most of us understand children twerking on camera, with encouraging music, is definitely more an endorsement of the behavior rather than a social commentary against it. You know, just based on how obviously gross this film treats its child actors who, as far as I'm convinced, are victims of child exploitation. What with them being children who're clearly exploited. What we've learned here is Netflix really does think we're morons, and either can't spot the difference between child exploitation and social commentary against child exploitation, or they don't care about exploiting children and are happy to do so on their platform. As for me and my opinion, it seems far more the latter scenario than the former.
Bret Baier Asks Biden Staffer: 'How Would Biden Handled COVID?' His Answer is Impressively Stupid9/11/2020 ![]() How would a President Joe Biden have handled the COVID situation? Fair question, right? Well, you'd think so. FoxNews' Bret Baier tried finding the answer in an interview with TJ Ducklo, a Biden lackey, and didn't get one. But he did get a lot of obfuscation and was then told the entire network of Fox was looking for excuses for President Trump. Add this video to your morning coffee, it's rich. Video: Here's just a sample of the back-and-forth between Fox News Channel's @BretBaier and TJ Ducklo from the Biden campaign. Baier repeatedly asked the simple question of what Biden would have done differently on COVID, and Ducklo accuses him of being a Trump campaign stooge pic.twitter.com/kQw9PZJAUk Bret: "Yeah, but your dude wants to run this operation. So how would he have run the COVID any differently than Trump, the dude he's trying to unseat?" Ducklo: "Listen, my dude can't remember much, but he does remember he wants to be president. Maybe he doesn't remember why. Maybe he doesn't remember how to use a fork. But he does remember that FoxNews is CNN's mortal enemy. So let me refuse to answer the question by talking a lot while modeling my hair. Don't you just love it? Look it how thick." Sure I took some creative liberties, but you tell me my version isn't more helpful. I bet Ducklo's hair sniffs like a fine wine. Or would if it sat atop a lady's scalp. Here's the main problem with what Ducklo did and didn't say: the internet is forever. All it takes is a couple of clicks, a few finger pecks, and near everyone of voting age can skip back through time to read that Joe Biden was just as all over the place on coronavirus as media was. The only excuse Biden can give for this egregious flip flopping is his diminishing mental faculties brought on mainly by age compounded with slavish partisan hackery.
![]() First it was the poster, then it was the trailer, and now the film has confirmed it. The Neftlix movie "Cuties" really is as bad as everyone on Twitter said it was. I didn't have time to watch the whole film (and don't think I could stand to), but this afternoon I did manage to pull it up on my desktop computer so I could easily skim through it. The film is available to anyone who has a Netflix subscription, okay? Okay. But to illustrate just how bad this film is, I am going to include a few choice screen captures. I do this to illustrate the severity of the problem with this film, not to endorse or encourage anyone to watch it. Let's be real: pedophiles have already seen this film or are on their third rewatching. Also if you're an active pedophile, I strongly encourage fashioning yourself some heavy footwear and going for a swim. By now you know the plot of this film surrounds an eleven-year-old girl, Amy, who wants to flee her "conservative" home life. Rather than doing something truly empowering like, I dunno, reading books and getting educated, Amy sees a girl her age dancing in the laundry room and then decides, yes, the slutty life is the life for me. If only Amy had stumbled upon a girl buried in a pile of books, or painting a masterpiece. But swaying the hips while dressed in a crop top is totally the same as reading Virginia Wolf. Now I held my judgement on this film for a specific reason: the religious, conservative right has a way of conflating a subject being portrayed in fiction as an endorsement of it. That's not always the case. In fact it's often not the case. Still, I had my suspicion that Cuties was as rotten as it turned out to be. But I wanted to see how bad for myself. The religious conservatives were right. This movie is disgusting. Take this scene. This is following the girls doing a suggestive dance routine after which they wanted to "rank" themselves. Before this moment, the blond girl mocked Amy for having a flat butt. I remember being eleven. Never once did anyone talk about flat butts. Later in the film, Amy somehow tries to become a member of the dance team despite the dance team treating her like garbage. I understand kids and girls can be mean, but again, as someone who had a childhood AS A GIRL, this isn't normal behavior. Never mind, in the film it's treated as totally normal. In order to up the ante, Amy learns how to twerk by watching disgusting rap videos of women twerking (when she should've been praying). Then she teaches the dance troupe how to twerk. That's the tamest capture I could snap. Later in the film, the girls go to what appears to be Laser Tag (I skimmed, I didn't watch this trash) and to prove they made it into this slutty dance competition, twerk for the creepy staff. That guy above is totally the target audience. Change my mind. The film doesn't get better, it gets worse. But I feel like what I've included proves the main point. The filmmakers weren't concerned with telling a story. This isn't about how a child escaped oppression by finding her own agency and independence. This is a story that glamorizes sexual exploitation of children for the purpose of encouraging children to exploit themselves sexually. Why? Well clearly the left is pushing to normalize pedophilia. They've been on this crusade for at least five years that I can verify personally. But it's been going on much longer than that. There are perverts in our ranks. There are adults who want to exploit children for their own sick pleasures. From the looks of this film Cuties we might as well include everyone who brought this film to being among their ranks. We shouldn't pretend this film is the only example of child exploitation. I do admit I roll my eyes at parents who happily put their girls in overly sexualized attire for beauty pageants. Netflix maybe felt they could get away with this film based on how long we've tolerated girls being portrayed as sex objects. Not young women, girls. Heck, a lot of models get their start at 12 to 14. Rock on, parents. But "Cuties" isn't apologetic. It's not hiding. It knows what it is, it knows what it's doing. The sick part about it isn't the film itself, which is disgusting enough. The sick part is that the film felt now was the right time to thrive. Makes sense when, before COVID, "Desmond the Amazing" is dancing for adults and being praised for it, drag queens are reading to children (and those parents take them their voluntarily), and parents are actively trying to transition their children to something their not. So yes. The filmmakers of Cuties should feel ashamed. But so should many parents who created the environment for this film to be comfortably released.
![]() People can make books about whatever they want, and we can choose to buy them or instead, make little bonfires with our cash. Read that again if you somehow want to twist my opining on this subject as some kind of attack on free expression. My issue here is my issue with the body pride movement as a whole, that is that everything needs to be deemed beautiful at all times. No. Here's the setup: a woman in Sydney, Australia was made to feel bad about her parts downunder (these are the jokes) by a former sexual partner. So rather than just assuming that sexual partner was kind of a knob, Ellie Eggwick first considered "labiaplasty." This is apparently a procedure to doll up the nethers. I'm learning so many things I never wanted to. While in the fact-finding mission, a doctor told Ellie her bits were perfectly normal. You're right, it should've ended there. But it's 2020, and things have to get worse. So now Ellie is on a crusade to "prove" that all vay-jay-jays are beautiful. The episode inspired Ms Eggwick, 30, to photograph more than 500 vaginas for a coffee table book. Okay, listen. Ms. Eggwick does sound like someone who might be a wee insecure. Were she to stumble upon this blog, her reaction to this very post might be to create a coffee table book of people reading blogs about them to normalize... I don't know, I was hoping the point would come to me. Ellie, if you're here, contact Tess Holliday, Lena Dunham and Amy Schumer. I've said some not nice things about them after they've thrust their bodies into traditional beauty standards in hopes of stretching the standards like a well-worn pair of yoga pants. Here's my issue with both the coffee table book of vags, and the general idea we need to "normalize" that which is already normal: not everything is beautiful (and that's okay) and this obsession with genitals must end. Also, who sips their morning caffeine and thinks "I really need to look at vaginas." There you are, sitting on your couch or the couch of a friend, and The Great Book of Gorgeous Vaginas looks up at you. I really need to know who is going to buy such a thing, so I can stay permanently socially distanced from them. Faces are pretty. Perhaps a nice pair of boobs might be considered pretty, certainly attractive. But really that's it. We generally don't say "Wow, you have really pretty fingers" or "What pretty heels you have." Nor do we look at arm pits and marvel at their grace. There's a reason pinup models feature long-legged, busty ladies. There's a reason men in superhero movies are shown shirtless and not PANTLESS. Genitals ain't pretty, y'all. They're normal, natural, but not for public display. Just like I don't want a photographic spread of people's nasal septums (also normal and natural, by the way), so I don't need to see photos of women's front holes, or men's mushroom-capped giggle sticks. We all have one or the other. Why can't that be the end of it? Our bodies are our bodies. Not every bit and piece needs to be celebrated with ticker tape parades. If you're dating a dude who wants to mate with you and insults an integral part of the process, maybe just dump his ass and move on with your life? Just an idea.
|
Steven Crowder Archive Crowder a conservative Canadian-American political commentator, and comedian YouTuber. Archives
June 2024
Categories |